Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Las Vegas is not Disneyland, Part 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Las Vegas is not Disneyland, Part 3

    In this post, I will begin a personal, hence subjective and limited, historical overview of Las Vegas sportsbetting scene. Because I arrived in Vegas in 1983 or 84, I know very little, other than some hearsay, about what happened prior to my arrival. Furthermore, I have probably forgotten more than I remember. Nonetheless, since some of you seem to enjoy reading this type of material, and I enjoy writing it, here goes.

    When I first arrived in Vegas, sportsbetting tickets were still handwritten. Naturally, this led to all kinds of corruption. For example, one time I returned to the Fremont, which at that time was independent of the Stardust, to bet an NBA total. However, the line had move against me, and I kind of bitched out loud. Well, the sportsbook manager, who was there alone, heard me and said, "Listen, buddy, I can give you the number you want. How much is it worth it to you?" Anyway, the computerization of sportsbetting in the mid-80s put an end to these types of shenanigans.

    Prior to Michael Roxborough, Bob Martin was the Las Vegas linesmaker. Martin made the betting lines by "feel." He likened making the right betting line to the feel one gets by slipping one's hand into the perfect size glove. Anyway, Martin, who had mob ties, got involved in some legal problems, and Vegas needed a new linesmaker. Enter Michael Roxborough.

    Michael Roxborough had arrived in Vegas as a long-haired, sandal-wearing hippie who lived out of his van. However, he had a slick tongue, good contacts, and the ear of the right people. He was able to convince Scottie Shettler, then the Stardust sportsbook manager, that he was the man to replace Martin. Thus began the Roxborough reign.

    Roxborough cut his hair, put on a suit and tie, and symbolized the transition of Vegas sportsbetting from old-school mob to new- school corporate and computerized.

    How good was the Roxborough betting line versus the Bob Martin line? When I posed this question to Lem Banker, the legendary Vegas sportsbettor, he said, "Bob Martin's line was easy for me to beat. Roxborough's is much tougher."

    And, I would have to say that Roxborough's line has gotten progressively better over time. Until relatively recently, the opening Stardust betting line generally tended to move toward the Caribbean line created by Monty at CRIS. However, from my observation, lately, the Caribbean line is tending to move more toward the Stardust line. In other words, Roxy now makes the better opening line.

    Roxborough is very sharp. He reads all the published sportsbetting material (available through Gambler's Book Club in Las Vegas)and loves to hear from sportsbettors who stupidly tell him what they know. A couple of examples: (1)Years ago, NFL games in dome stadiums tended to be good "over" bets because of ideal weather conditions. Someone told Roxy about this trend and sure enough, the line quickly adjusted, ending any edge knowledgeable sportsbettors had regarding this situation. (2) The strongest angle, in terms of quantity and quality, that I ever found in sportsbetting was: when a NBA team wins at home and plays on the road the next day, bet against them. From the early to late 80's, over seven or eight consecutive seasons, this angle averaged 57 to 58% a year on a high volume of plays. It was sure money in the bank. Then a guy named Andy Iskoe, came out with a book that included this angle, and sure enough, the opening line adjusted and the angle stopped winning. A point in the NBA is worth just under 4%. So, since a bettor must hit 52.38% winners to break even, a mere 1 to 1.5 point adjustment by the linesmaker would negate a player's edge.

    For a period in the mid-80's, sportsbettors who made a Sagarin-type computerized betting line had an edge against the linesmakers, particularly in college basketball. However, Roxy is well aware of Sagarin's ratings, and even has his own computer people. Thus, someone must now be extremely sophisticated to write a computer program that makes a better line than Roxy's.

    When Scottie Shettler ran the Stardust in the 80's, it was ultra-corrupt. He and his two supervisors, Richard and Syl, had a deal going with Sam Brown, probably the greatest middler-scalper in Vegas history. Sam, an old Jewish guy in his 70s, would sit in the front row all day at the Stardust. Then, to use baseball as an example, when a phone bet came in, they would jump the line in a quantum-like 10 cent increment (note: this was prior to the acceptance of the penny line in Vegas) and ol' Sam would waddle to the counter, bet 5 dimes, then saunter to the pay phones and scalp the game with one of his private bookies, among them the legendary Doc and the Chinaman. I would venture to guess that in the course of a typical day, Sam would probably get 30+ 5 to 10 cent 5-dime baseball scalps. Do the math and imagine the profit. Naturally, Scottie, Richard, and Syl, and later a red-haired gal named Patty, were well taken care of by Sam. Of course, line movement tended to stop until Sam returned to his seat. I was read the riot act and nearly 86ed out of the Dust when I tried to compete with Sam. I could not afford that at the time, so I had to survive on the leftovers.

    Sam actually liked me, since I was bright, a hustler, and also Jewish. He offered to hire me. My job would have been to go around and get him numbers at sportsbooks around town. Unfortunately, I declined. It would have saved me immense headache and heartache if I would have done that instead of starting my own operation. I probably could have eventually taken over Sam's gig and gotten access to his incomparable connections and privates.

    Sam, who claimed that he had been robbed 7 different times, did give me some invaluable advice: always write down your ticket number on a separate slip of paper. Because of this, I was able to recoup $30,000 worth of outstanding tickets when I was robbed( The robbers were identified and eventually caught when they tried to cash the stolen tickets, all because we had called the casinos in advance with the ticket numbers.)Another time, I carelessly lost my wallet with $20,000 of sportsbetting tickets. Again, I simply referred to my sheet, called the casinos, and the guy with my wallet was apprehended and my tickets returned to me.

    One final piece on Lem Banker, who, if not Billy Walters, is the most famous sports bettor in Las Vegas history. Lem has an ego that won't quit. Example: Whenever I saw him in a Vegas casino--naturally he was always bedecked with gold jewelry--he would immediately greet me with an unsolicited "Today I really like so-and-so..." As if I cared! Lem did not impress me with his wisdom. Sources have told me he made most of his money from shading. He would get huge orders on games, say an NFL game at +7, find a +7 and-a-half, and when the game fell 7, 'ol Lem would rake in the doe. The last time I talked to Lem, his advice to me, believe it or not, was to invest in Ginny Maes (not sure of spelling), some type of money market
    investment. This from a world-famous gambler!

  • #2
    Reno. What you say is very true. But you left out one little thing. This pratice of stealing money by the managers at the Stardust was also done at some 10 other books in Vegas. Until a friend of mine, a real better and not a middler who would sit at the
    Dust waiting all day to get the line he needed for his plays. He was very upset at what he saw and was explained what was going on. He then went to the gaming commision and
    and filed complaints against the Dust. You know what happened afterwords. Today all Vegas books are run by College Trustworthy nerds. Vegas hates to get ripped off and will never let this happen again. Do you think this is why there are no more bookmakers in Vegas anymore? These People have destroyed any chance of Vegas being a real place to place sport wagers. True or false? They were all scum who had the greatest jobs in the world but had to steal on the side. I also got ripped off by the Dust with there safety deposit boxes behind the cashier's cage without camera's. Scotty can you read!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Yep, Polar, everyone who was at the Dust in the 80's knew you. You were an institution there, Robby. For years you worked as a runner for the same outfit as Don Bessett (who started Don Best) did. I remember the debate as to whether you lost the money betting or whether The Stardust ripped it off from your box. I will take you at your word, based on how corrupt the Stardust was and since you were such a loyal and competent worker for so long. I had heard from a couple people that you were working for Looselines, so I knew it was the case. You make a valid point that I was planning to discuss in my next post: Giving sportsbook managers the authority and autonomy that was granted to Scotty Shettler types helped seal the doom of independent sportsbook managers. Too many of these guys were corrupt and some were also incompetent as bookmakers. There weren't too many Gene Maydays (Little Caesar's) or Sonny Reizners (at the Castaways). By turning sportsbook managers into empty suits who were mere puppets updating their betting lines not on action, but on what Roxborough told them, corruption was reduced and perhaps a steady bottomline, which was what the corporate head honchos sought, achieved. But the art of bookmaking was also defiled in the process.

      Regarding "loose lines," my opinion is this: There are two types of loose lines--those created by the bookmaker and those created by the bettors. If a BM opens with lines substantially different than the CRIS-Stardust norm, wiseguys will simply bet these lines back toward the norm. Hence, the BM will only get one-way action and, in reality, he will be gambling instead of booking. However, if a sportsbook is loaded with squares who don't shop, the betting lines will naturally become "loose" from the action. Then wiseguys can step in, cherry-pick the good lines, and bet them back toward the norm. Thus, a true bookmaker can flourish with a mixture of wiseguys and squares because he will tend to get the desired two-way action to balance his book.

      Gary Austin was the father of the first type of "loose lines," those created by the BM. He would open his betting lines way off the norm. And, bettors would line up and hammer his opening lines right back toward the norm. If Austin's lines were better than the norm, he would do great. If not, he would incur heavy losses. But Austin was more of a gambler than a bookmaker. And he wasn't as smart as he thought he was, as history proved. The collective wisdom that goes into establishing the norm must be respected. The norm can be beaten, but it must be respected. When I was in Vegas I saw plenty of guys, especially at the Stardust opening line, who would rant and rave about how stupid Roxborough was and how weak his lines were. Amazingly, most of these guys arrived in Vegas in $30,000 cars...and eventually left in $1,000,000 buses.

      Comment


      • #4
        reno - great post. very interesting and very imformative(even if i don't quite understand how some of these scams worked). you should write a book.

        polar - you really need a translator. anyone out there speak jiberish?

        Comment


        • #5
          Reno- As I have stated before, Good Job on your reviews and posts. Awhile back, someone asked whether the Spiro in the "Wiseguys" story was the same as the one who runs Olympic sports. I assumed he was, while Jeff wasn't completely sure but didn't think so. Do you have any insight about this. Just curious?

          Comment


          • #6
            Reno, I also appreciate your insight into the history of Las Vegas bookmaking. I can remember going into the Stardust in the late 70s on my once or twice yearly visits, and wishing I owned the phone booths outside the place. With my luck, I would have bought them the month before everyone got cell phones. I used to spend my time down town because, as a lone wolf, I could get access to four or five lines in 5 minutes and my action didn't exceed their mostly low limits. One other tourist, acting like a big shot, stated loudly that his local book took more action than all these down town guys did combined. For all I know, he may have been right. I remember hitting up the Fremont for 3 dollars getting Siena plus 7 in an NIT game against South Carolina when Siena was really the favorite. They weren't too happy paying the bet so I called in the Gaming Commission whose house shill somehow concluded that I had lost the bet since Siena won the game but hadn't covered the actual line of minus 7. Anyway, despite the Gaming Commission's lack of help, Freemont finally paid up willingly (they had wanted to simply give me the bet back), which was a boom to me since it was about the only bet I hit the whole trip. Reno, you probably also remember the New Yorker who hung out at fabulous Leroy's downtown and was USA Today's odds expert on boxing at the time. The guy said he left New York after spending time in jail for bookmaking.

            Comment


            • #7
              Reno, I wonder how Sonny "Circle" Reisner
              can be compared to Gene Mayday???

              Comment


              • #8
                Rawhide, I don't know who runs Olympic. I have just assumed, as their ads imply, that it is "the Greek," whoevever he may be. Doug Deac, is the guy you're talking about Herbie "Hoops" Lembeck, who used to make the boxing line for Las Vegas? Herbie used to manage Leroy's for Vic Salerno. I didn't hang out too much at Leroy's, but other guys I knew there included the Crab, who made a killing in NBA totals before Vegas figured out how to make a decent line; **** the Pick, a big guy with an acid tongue; and Jack Lysaught, who worked at Leroy's before he became the sportsbook manager at the Riviera. Grubbie, like I said at the beginning of my post, I've forgotten more than I remember. Now that you bring it up, my memory clicks in about Sonny and his penchant for circling games. And, I do believe that the Castaways limit on baseball games, which was ordinarily $1,500, would get cut in half on Sonny's circled games. Sonny was not independently wealthy like Mayday, and he had to answer to Castaways management. However, I remember consistently finding great(different)lines in that place, a reflection of Sonny's independence. In terms of sheer size of bets booked, no one in Vegas that I knew could compare to Gene Mayday.

                Comment


                • #9
                  reno- from previous posts, I've read about
                  your disgust(rightfully so) about the books
                  in Vegas and their ridiculously low limits.
                  My question is: how is the job the sports
                  book managers are doing, following what the corporate suits want, any different than Sonny following the orders of Castaways management??

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Reno, you're right Herbie's the guy. I wonder if he's still living. That was quite a crowd that used to hang out at Leroy's bar. I think that most had given up on gambling and settled for a sure thing - drinking.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Reno, very interesting. The manager of Stardust now I believe is a guy named Joe Luppo. I really know nothing about him but I have heard him on the radio before and he sounds more like a public relations guy than he does a bookmaker.

                      If you get a chance, listen to Cash Pomer's show sponsored by Bowman's International on Sunday morning from 10:00 a.m. - noon ET. You can get it on Real Audio at "www.fan590.com".

                      Cash Pomer is a tout, but the show has on every Sunday various bookmakers including Joe Luppo. If you listen to the guy you'd think he was a used-car salesman and not a sportsbook manager.

                      My question to you or Polar (who I'm starting to realize is a lot more knowledgeable than we made him out to be), is why Vegas is no longer a place that Wiseguys want to be. Is it because the lines are better due to computerization, or is it because the limits are so low and the lines move so quickly that there is no way to make money?

                      Also, have you ever heard of Bob McCowan? He also has a radio show on the same station and it sounds like he is/was a professional bettor that used to beat up on Vegas until the lines became unbettable. Ever hear of him?

                      Thanks.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        DeacDoug, I don't know if Herbie Hoops is still alive. He retired several years ago.
                        I believe that Herbie, whose real last name is Lembeck (or something like that), became Herbie "Hoops" because he used to make the college basketball line for Bob Martin. Herbie was a super nice guy and, obviously, he was very sharp.

                        Grubbie, If I didn't know better, I might actually start to think that you are not a loyal member of the Sonny "Circle" Reizner fan club. Didn't you read his book? Anyway, corporate suits who run sportsbooks these days are mere puppets who constantly change their betting lines, not according to action, but according to what Roxborough tells them. As soon as lines begin to move in the few major casinos, the so-called "off joints" are contacted with the information, and they immediately adjust their lines so as to duplicate the major casinos. Sonny Reizner practiced, within the budgetary parameters established by the Castaways, the art of bookmaking; these corporate suits, on the other hand, practice the art of puppetry.

                        Hartley, when I recently got rid of my old sportsbetting books, among them was a book on football handicapping by Bob McCune. Now that you tell me Bob McCune can no longer pick winners, I will have to run down to the Salvation Army store and shoplift the book back off the shelf. Otherwise, a transient might get hold of it and blow his liquor bankroll following the dated advice of a former sportsbetting Guru who is now a has-been.

                        Bob McCune is educated and writes well. He understands and can communicate to others the rudimentary aspects of sportsbetting. He has been around a long time. When I was in Vegas, he constantly had articles in the local sportsbetting rags to drum up followers for his handicapping service. However, nothing he ever wrote impresed me. There was never any real depth to what he said. Anyway, that's enough on Bob McCune...especially since I gotta hurry down and retrieve his book before it gets into the wrong hands...

                        There are still plenty of wiseguys in Vegas. With so many sportsbooks, it is easy for someone to go around town and bet huge amounts on a game. However, as I detailed in an earlier post, phone acccounts don't take much anymore. Anyway, you can bet your bankroll that most of the wiseguys in Vegas also have offshore accounts.

                        Many Vegas sportsbetting professionals have left to work offshore, because that's where the money is at. Vegas is local, a drop in the bucket compared to offshore, which is global. The opening Stardust line will tend to be a bit different than the CRIS line, but the differences are quickly ironed out by bettors, and in short time there is no difference between the Vegas line and offshore lines. Plenty of guys play into both.

                        What Vegas, via the authority of the Gaming Control Board, has sought to do, is drive out syndicate betting. (Maybe they should enlist the help of Intertops in this never ending battle.) Vegas has retaliated against organized betting groups that have runners in every major casino. It has retaliated by introducing regulations, discussed in my previous posts, that curtail such activity. The Vegas sportsbooks all work together, but they are afraid of bettors who do the same.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Reno-

                          First of all, I would like to mention that I have immensely enjoyed your articles on the Vegas scene. You are undoubtably very knowledgable on the subject and I'm sure everyone (myself included) look foward to reading them, and I hope that you continue to do so. However, I would like to point out something I've noticed in the context of your posts that confuses me. Please, by all means, correct me if I'm wrong because I very well may be, but it seems to me you have a sense of bitterness towards Vegas and the changes that have developed there in the last decade +. I do not mean this to be derogotary in any way or a shot at you, I just don't understand the source of your feelings. All Vegas has done in regards to their booking is flow with the times and take advantage of technology that has developed. These casino, like any other business, are in business to make a profit, and it would be irresponsible for their own bottom line to not take advantage of these advancements. For the average Joe, nothing on the surface has changed. One can still walk into a casino, check out the line, make a rational and educated decision, and plop down a dime or so on his favorite team. As far as the NGCB attempting to drive out sydicates and other sorts, can you really blame them? In my opinion, syndicate betting has nothing to do with actual sports wagering whatsoever. In actuality, all it is is the art of perfect and precise timing, effective communication, and staying one step ahead of the system. All Vegas is doing is saying "check" and using tecnology to stay a step or two ahead of the syndies and others. I don't believe this is unethical, just sound business practice, especially in the face of Vegas's rapidly changing target market. Catering to the family of five from the midwest with 3 small children has, in effect, changed it's environment, causing the gaming industy to become less and less of a factor in the "Vegas Experience" By the way, this pisses me off as much as anybody else, but I can't do anything about it, and quite frankly I don't blame them. These days when my career takes me to Vegas or I just go to Vegas (which is not very often), I eat alot of good food, drink alot of good drinks, perhaps catch a show, and sometimes acquire the services of a errrr "self-employed model." As far as serious wagering, I just wait until I get home.

                          -Jr44


                          p.s. Keep up your excellent posts as I have started to look forward to them. Also, any experiences or tidbits involving the Horseshoe, specifcally in the mid to late 70's. I'm sure you probably know what I'm talking about.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            -
                            Last edited by Don Best; 05-02-2002, 01:02 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think the truth of the matter is that with gamblers becoming as knowledgeable (if not more) than the books via. computers, syndicates and many options for line etc., sports-betting is no longer a money maker for the books. With the exception of NFL football and NBA (to a smaller degree) the books are happy to break even on sports like baseball, hockey and auto racing. They still need to offer sports wagering to attract people to the casinos but for the most part they would be just as happy to do away with the sportsbooks.

                              Add to this the fact that they are making a lot of money by dealing with the families via. amusement parks, hotel fees and parents who are more concerned with their kids whereabouts than with winning money at the casinos and the professional bettor really IS a pain in the ass for the casinos. In the past the successful books were the ones that could beat the players. Nowadays the successful books are those that could keep their head above water but be enticing enough in appearance to attract the small time players and families to the casino/play areas.

                              Also don't forget that Roxy has an alterior motive now. Not only does he have a share in Leroy's, but he also has Mega$ports running in Vegas and Australia and this is a no-risk system to the books. They start a line and adjust it automatically with the public betting. This type of guaranteed money making pari-mutuel betting would be a dream of any book who would guarantee a win on any sport just by being in existence.

                              You can't really blame Vegas for no longer wanting smart money and huge bets when they can do better without them. Still I can see why it is discouraging for the professional gambler. For real sports betting, I have no doubt that the Carribean and Australia will become sports betting king for North American bettors if it isn't already.

                              BTW, Reno, the guys name was Bob McCowan not Bob McCune (assuming he didn't change his name). BTW, do you know anything of Joe Luppo?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X