The absence of ties this season in hockey--there's been only one--has me thinking that hockey might be good for scalps. Today (Thursday) I noticed the following lines, at separate books:
San Jose: - 1/2 -125
and
Edmonton +180 on the money line.
Looked like a good scalp to me.
My question, to those who know hockey, is: how much of a scalp is needed to guarantee profitability over the long run?How often can we expect to see ties this year with the new rules? And does the likelihood of a tie diminish, the bigger the mismatch?
San Jose: - 1/2 -125
and
Edmonton +180 on the money line.
Looked like a good scalp to me.
My question, to those who know hockey, is: how much of a scalp is needed to guarantee profitability over the long run?How often can we expect to see ties this year with the new rules? And does the likelihood of a tie diminish, the bigger the mismatch?
Comment