A BET YOU CAN GO TO THE BANK ON...

[REALITY]

Originally posted by Curious:
Reality:

YOU asked for an opinion. Do you remember that? I gave one, apparently not to your liking.

I didn't know you were looking for only bouqets and accolades. You should have told me first.

CURIOUS,

YOUR ABSOLUTE FIRST POST IN REGARDS TO REALITY AND TO THIS TOPIC:

Originally posted by Curious:

All this post proves is that Reality shills for ALL his buddies and/or former employers (not just CRIS), which means his opinion carries very little weight with those who see through his tired routine.

CURIOUS,

I WOULD SAY THIS CONSTITUTES AN ATTACK ON MY CREDIBILITY AND INTEGRITY.

WHAT DO YOU THINK???

REALITY

[REALITY]

CURIOUS,

HELLO!

CAT GOT YOUR TONGUE?

I CANT WAIT TO SEE WHAT LAME ASS RESPONSE YOU HAVE TO THIS POST.

KEEP TALKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF YOUR MOUTH.

I THINK IT'S ABOUT TIME FOR YOU TO THROW IN YOUR CARDS AND FOLD YOUR HAND.

THIS GAME AINT FOR YOU...

REALITY

[Curious]

In the context it was written it was a statement of fact -- nothing more, nothing less.

Are you now saying that you don't shill for all your buddies and ex-employers?

Perhaps the word shill is a bit harsh. That was the word being used in that thread. How about if we replace it with "act in an overly enthusiastic, unobjective manner"?

[Curious]

Reality:

Now I see you're resorting to childish name calling because I didn't post a response quickly enough for you. Some of us do have lives outside of posting forums.

Try to act your age a little more often. Dealing with you is like dealing with a spoiled child who's just been told they can't have their way.

I have tried to keep this on a civil, adult level, but that seems to be asking too much of you. I'm done with this nonsense.

Maybe I'll see you again on down the road. Now assuming that you'll stay true to form, let your ranting, mud slinging, and name calling begin.

[REALITY]

[quote]Originally posted by Curious:


Are you now saying that you don't shill for all your buddies and ex-employers?

SHILL?

SHILL?

HOW ABOUT ENDORSE!

SOME PEOPLE IN THESE FORUMS AND IN THIS BUSINESS HAVE SOME RESPECT AND SOME FAITH IN MY INTEGRITY IN REGARDS TO THIS BUSINESS.

I HAVE CLOSE TO 3,000 POSTS IN THE THE BIG THREE GAMBLING FORUMS.

DO A SEARCH AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF IF I BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE IN REGARDS TO THIS BUSINESS AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY.

I KNOW AT LEAST 30 BOOKS,MANY WHO I CONSIDER MY FRIENDS.

HOW DO YOU THINK THEY FEEL WHEN THEY READ MY POSTS AND DONT SEE THEIR BOOK MENTIONED?

I NOW ONLY ENDORSE 5 BOOKS BECAUSE OF MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PRINCIPALS OR MY INTIMATE KNOWLEDGE OF THE ORGANIZATION BECAUSE I HAVE EXPERIENCED IT FIRST HAND.

WHEN I ENDORSE A BOOK I PUT MY REPUTATION AND INTEGRITY BEHIND IT.

WHAT IS MY ENDORSEMENT?

YOU WILL NEVER HEAR "NO PAY" OR "SLOW PAY"
IN REGARDS TO THOSE BOOKS.

PERIOD.

WHEN I ENDORSE THEM I DONT SAY MENTION "REALITY" AND GET AN EXTRA 5% ON YOUR DEPOSIT AND BECOME PART OF AN AFFILIATE PROGRAM FOR REALITY.

THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SHILL AND AN ENDORSEMENT.

Perhaps the word shill is a bit harsh.

YA'THINK???

That was the word being used in that thread. How about if we replace it with "act in an overly enthusiastic, unobjective manner"?

THERE ARE A LOT OF WORDS IN A THREAD.

DOES THE FACT THAT THEY ARE IN A THREAD MAKE THEM CORRECT OR APPLICABLE TO THE SUBJECT MATTER AT HAND?

IF YOU LIKE TO "JUMP ON THE BAND WAGON" OF AN AGENDA BEING PUT FORTH IN A POST YOU READ LET ME SUGGEST YOU CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING BY YOURS TRULY:

Originally posted by REALITY:
[QB]
IN A WORLD WHERE THERE IS A PREVAILING "HOORAY FOR ME AND F**K YOU!"ATTITUDE, IT IS AN ADMIRABLE QUALITY "TO PUT YOUR NECK ON A CHOPPING BLOCK" FOR SOMEONE ELSE FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN YOU FELT THAT IT WAS SOMETHING THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT...

REALITY

[ 07-13-2001: Message edited by: REALITY ]

[Ronbets]

Curious,

What do you do for a living that qualifies slander for an opinion? Our cards are face up. How about yours sniper?

[Ronbets]

I guess the American League curfew applies here. No post can begin after 1AM.

Ok, pack up the gear and we'll resume tomorrow.

[ 07-13-2001: Message edited by: Ronbets ]

[REALITY]

Originally posted by Ronbets:

I guess the American League curfew applies here. No post can begin after 1AM.

Ok, pack up the gear and we'll resume tomorrow.

[ 07-13-2001: Message edited by: Ronbets ]

ANOTHER RONBETS CLASSIC...

LMMFAO! :D

[Unregistered]

Re: A BET YOU CAN GO TO THE BANK ON...

Originally posted by REALITY




IF IT WERE POSSIBLE TO ACCESS THE FOLLOWING FACTORS AND ENTER THEM IN THE FOLLOWING FORMULA TO DETERMINE THE WISEGUY/SHARP INDEX (W.S.I.) FOR A PARTICULAR SHOP,C.R.I.S.WOULD HAVE THE HIGHEST W.S.I.

BAR NONE!

NECESSARY FACTORS FOR THE COMPUTATION:

PLAYERS WIN %:6 WINS,4 LOSSES,60%

PLAYERS HANDLE:TOTAL AMOUNT WAGERED, 10 GAMES LAYING 11,000/10,000,TOTAL HANDLE 110,000.

THE COMPUTATION:

WIN PERCENTAGE x THE HANDLE= THE W.S.I.

IN THIS CASE:

.6O% X 110,000=66,000

THIS PLAYERS W.S.I. WOULD BE 66,000.

IT'S NECESSARY TO DEAL WITH THESE LARGE NUMBERS SO THAT IF A PLAYER COULD SUSTAIN A 60% WIN PERCENTAGE AGAINST HIS PLAY OF 1,100,000 HIS W.S.I.WOULD BE 660,000.

AND THIS HIGHER FIGURE WOULD REFLECT THE HIGH PERCENTAGE OF WISEGUY WORK IN AN OPERATIONS TOTAL HANDLE.

IF THIS DATA WERE AVAILABLE AND YOU COULD COMPUTE IT FOR EVERY PLAYER WITH A WINNING RECORD IN EVERY OPERATION YOU CAN GO TO THE BANK THE WISEGUY/SHARP INDEX WITH C.R.I.S. WOULD BE THE HIGHEST WITHOUT A DOUBT.

IF YOU WANTED TO BE MORE FINITE YOU COULD TAKE THE PREVIOUS THREE YEARS OF ALL THE SHOPS IN THE SURVEY AND COME UP WITH A YEARLY AVERAGE.

A MORE ACCURATE AND FAIRER BAROMETER YET STILL A CLEAR CUT INDICATOR OF C.R.I.S. HAVING THE HIGHEST W.S.I.IN THE BUSINESS.

YOU COULD ALSO DO THE EXACT SAME THING WITH THE LOSING PLAYERS FIGURE CALLING THAT FIGURE THE RECREATIONAL/PUBLIC INDEX (R.P.I.).

HOWEVER TO DO THIS YOU WOULD HAVE TO TAKE THE LOSING PLAYERS WIN PERCENTAGE OF 40% AND MERELY COVERT IS TO A LOSING PERCENTAGE OF 60%.

NECESSARY FACTORS FOR THE COMPUTATION:

PLAYERS WIN %:4 WINS,6 LOSSES,60%

PLAYERS HANDLE:TOTAL AMOUNT WAGERED, 10 GAMES LAYING 11,000/10,000,TOTAL HANDLE 110,000.

THE COMPUTATION:

LOSE PERCENTAGE x THE HANDLE= THE R.P.I.

IN THIS CASE:

.6O% X (-110,000)=(-66,000)

THIS PLAYERS R.P.I. WOULD BE (-66,000).

BY SUBTRACTING THE MINUS RECREATIONAL/PUBLIC INDEX (R.P.I.) FROM THE W.S.I. THAT FIGURE WOULD REFLECT THE CONCENTRATION OF THE WISEGUY/SHARP WORK IN A SHOP AND COULD ALSO DETERMINE IF THE SHARP/WISEGUY ACTION COULD BE OVERCOME BY THE EXISTING RECREATIONAL/PUBLIC WORK THAT EXISTS IN THE TOTAL HANDLE OF AN OPERATION.

THIS FIGURE COULD BE REFERED TO AS THE SHARP/PUBLIC BAROMETER (S.P.B.)

THE COMPUTATION:

AN OPERATION HAS TWO PLAYERS:

PLAYER A:

WIN PERCENTAGE x THE HANDLE= THE W.S.I.

IN THIS CASE:

.6O% X 1,100,000=660,000

THIS OPERATIONS W.S.I. WOULD BE 660,000.

PLAYER B:

LOSE PERCENTAGE x THE HANDLE= THE R.P.I.

IN THIS CASE:

.6O% X (-110,000)=(-66,000)

THIS SHOPS R.P.I. WOULD BE (-66,000).

IN THIS TWO PLAYER SHOP THE SHARP/PUBLIC BAROMETER (S.P.B.)IS COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS:

WISE./SH.INDEX - THE REC./PUB.INDEX=S.P.B.

IN THIS CASE:

660,000 - 66,000= 596,000

THE SHOP'S SHARP/PUBLIC BAROMETER = 596,000

THE HIGHER POSITIVE NUMBER REFLECTING A HIGHER CONCENTRATION OF WISEGUY/SHARP WORK.

THE HIGHER NEGATIVE NUMBER REFLECTING A HIGHER CONCENTRATION OF RECREATIONAL PUBLIC WORK.

AGAIN C.R.I.S.'S SHARP/PUBLIC BAROMETER (S.P.B) WOULD BE SECOND TO NONE AND BEAR OUT MICKEY OF C.R.I.S.'S CONTENTION ABOUT WHY THEIR OPERATION BY VIRTUE OF BEING AMONG, IF NOT THE LARGEST WISEGUY CLEARING HOUSE IN THE BUSINESS CANNOT FAIRLY BE COMPARED TO OTHER OPERATIONS.

REALITY