Very interesting information for the upcoming bowl season you may find useful, found on the net...
All THIS SEASON results are collective by all teams from each conference in games played during the 2007 season. All BOWL GAME Results are since 1980, unless indicated otherwise...
ACC CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 8 bowlers collectively they were 25-43-2 ATS as favs / struggled vs non-cons (11-18-1 ATS 6-8 vs > 500) / at best against opp allowed 28.5 PPG season (16-0 SU one team TY: Florida State
ACC BOWL GAMES: 7-1 ATS as dogs L3Y / best; 25-10-1 dogs 7 < pts: Florida State, Maryland and Virginia
BIG EAST CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 5 bowlers collectively they were 11-5 ATS as dogs / 17-4-1 ATS vs non-cons (7-1 SU & 6-2 ATS vs > 500) / at best against opp allowed 23 > PPG season (22-4 SU & 16-9-1 ATS 4 teams (one a dog): Cincinnati, Connecticut, So Florida and Rutgers
BIG EAST BOWL GAMES: hot hand 5-0 SU LY / worst role: dogs 6 > pts (3-12 ATS / 0-6 off loss): West Virginia
BIG 10 CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 8 bowlers collectively 8-2-1 ATS off BBLs (4-0 vs non-cons): Michigan and Purdue / 17-9 ATS vs non cons (7-1 SU vs > 500) / at best vs opp allowed 28 > PPG season: 17-1 SU & 12-5-1 ATS : Indiana and Wisconsin
BIG 10 BOWL GAMES: from BSR 10-2-1 ATS bowlers off BBL: Michigan and Purdue
BIG 12 CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 8 bowlers collectively 5-1-1 ATS w/rest and 11-4 ATS off BB SUATS wins: Oklahoma / 27-5 SU & 18-9 ATS vs non cons (22-1 SU & 18-5 ATS as favs but- 0-4 SUATS as dogs) / at best vs opp allowed 25.5 PPG on season: 31-6 SU & 22-12-2 ATS: Missouri and Oklahoma State
BIG 12 BOWL GAMES: 2-9 ATS off SU fav loss: Texas and Kansas / 1-7 ATS vs opp off BB losses: Colorado / 2-11 ATS vs opp off DDL: Texas Tech and 5-14 ATS vs opponent off loss: Texas Tech and Oklahoma
PAC 10 CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 6 bowlers collectively 8-4 SUATS w/rest / 15-3 SU & 10-7 ATS vs non con (3-1 SUATS vs > 500) / nothing special against bad defensive teams (because most of the themselves are just that) best being 25-11 SU vs opp allowed 24.5 > PPG: Arizona State
PAC 10 BOWL GAMES: quite simply: Good Dog (30-16 ATS / Bad favs (25-45-2 ATS) best dog role: 13-1 ATS off SUATS loss - Oregon / best fav role 6-15-2 ATS off SU loss - California
SEC CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 9 bowlers (most all conferences) collectively 7-0-2 ATS w/rest, also 19-12-2 ATS as dogs / 31-5 SU & 19-10 ATS vs non con (10-3 SUATS vs > 500) / at best vs opp allowed 27 > PPG: 27-5 SU: Alabama and Mississippi State
SEC BOWL GAMES: best roles: 13-6 ATS off SU fav loss: Kentucky / 39-23-1 ATS dogs 3 > points (19-7 ATS if .666 <): Arkansas and Mississippi State
All THIS SEASON results are collective by all teams from each conference in games played during the 2007 season. All BOWL GAME Results are since 1980, unless indicated otherwise...
ACC CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 8 bowlers collectively they were 25-43-2 ATS as favs / struggled vs non-cons (11-18-1 ATS 6-8 vs > 500) / at best against opp allowed 28.5 PPG season (16-0 SU one team TY: Florida State
ACC BOWL GAMES: 7-1 ATS as dogs L3Y / best; 25-10-1 dogs 7 < pts: Florida State, Maryland and Virginia
BIG EAST CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 5 bowlers collectively they were 11-5 ATS as dogs / 17-4-1 ATS vs non-cons (7-1 SU & 6-2 ATS vs > 500) / at best against opp allowed 23 > PPG season (22-4 SU & 16-9-1 ATS 4 teams (one a dog): Cincinnati, Connecticut, So Florida and Rutgers
BIG EAST BOWL GAMES: hot hand 5-0 SU LY / worst role: dogs 6 > pts (3-12 ATS / 0-6 off loss): West Virginia
BIG 10 CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 8 bowlers collectively 8-2-1 ATS off BBLs (4-0 vs non-cons): Michigan and Purdue / 17-9 ATS vs non cons (7-1 SU vs > 500) / at best vs opp allowed 28 > PPG season: 17-1 SU & 12-5-1 ATS : Indiana and Wisconsin
BIG 10 BOWL GAMES: from BSR 10-2-1 ATS bowlers off BBL: Michigan and Purdue
BIG 12 CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 8 bowlers collectively 5-1-1 ATS w/rest and 11-4 ATS off BB SUATS wins: Oklahoma / 27-5 SU & 18-9 ATS vs non cons (22-1 SU & 18-5 ATS as favs but- 0-4 SUATS as dogs) / at best vs opp allowed 25.5 PPG on season: 31-6 SU & 22-12-2 ATS: Missouri and Oklahoma State
BIG 12 BOWL GAMES: 2-9 ATS off SU fav loss: Texas and Kansas / 1-7 ATS vs opp off BB losses: Colorado / 2-11 ATS vs opp off DDL: Texas Tech and 5-14 ATS vs opponent off loss: Texas Tech and Oklahoma
PAC 10 CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 6 bowlers collectively 8-4 SUATS w/rest / 15-3 SU & 10-7 ATS vs non con (3-1 SUATS vs > 500) / nothing special against bad defensive teams (because most of the themselves are just that) best being 25-11 SU vs opp allowed 24.5 > PPG: Arizona State
PAC 10 BOWL GAMES: quite simply: Good Dog (30-16 ATS / Bad favs (25-45-2 ATS) best dog role: 13-1 ATS off SUATS loss - Oregon / best fav role 6-15-2 ATS off SU loss - California
SEC CONFERENCE BOWL REVIEW:
THIS SEASON: 9 bowlers (most all conferences) collectively 7-0-2 ATS w/rest, also 19-12-2 ATS as dogs / 31-5 SU & 19-10 ATS vs non con (10-3 SUATS vs > 500) / at best vs opp allowed 27 > PPG: 27-5 SU: Alabama and Mississippi State
SEC BOWL GAMES: best roles: 13-6 ATS off SU fav loss: Kentucky / 39-23-1 ATS dogs 3 > points (19-7 ATS if .666 <): Arkansas and Mississippi State
