If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I have not and I am sure they are tough at home. I am just saying with 12 games on the schedule tomorrow that there are much better spots. I just don't think it will be as easy a win as you think. This could be a preview of the Western Conf Championship. I would hate for someone to jump all over this game when it should be close. Just saying there are better spots tomorrow.
Does it go against one of your systems Garister? And by the way, I am not betting San Jose. I said I would lean towards St Louis, but I am not betting the game.
On those back to back plays, I usually look for the team to win the first game. So, I really like Toronto. I will probably bet against the other 2 as well because they are both pretty bad. Edm giving up so many goals at Pitt isn't a good combination for them.
So.. according to your system, the Islanders would be the play tonight at -185 with this the first of 4 home games. If they win tonight you continue wagering on them because they have 3 more home games. Right?
It doesn't matter that it's not 4 nights in a row only that it's 3 or more home games in a row?
How does the chase bet work? If you put 1.85 unit to win 1 and they lose do you put to Win 2.85 on the next game and so on?
Hey Resteasy, I can't answer the betting part of your question, I will let Garister answer that, but yes by his system they are a play tonight. You will never have more than 2 games in consecutive nights. Be careful you might get hooked on hockey. If you would like to talk I can explain some different plays to you. I think you would do well at hockey!!
system1-Yes, Islanders are the play tonight, if they lose you need to be able win enough on the next game plus 1 unit, so you are always winning 1 unit when your team wins, and so on if they lose 2 in a row as washington did before winning their 3 rd game.
If Islanders win tonight, for their next game to qualify, it must be -130 or higher, if its not, that game is not a play and the rest of
series won't qualify no matter how many games are left.
system1-Yes, Islanders are the play tonight, if they lose you need to be able win enough on the next game plus 1 unit, so you are always winning 1 unit when your team wins, and so on if they lose 2 in a row as washington did before winning their 3 rd game.
If Islanders win tonight, for their next game to qualify, it must be -130 or higher, if its not, that game is not a play and the rest of
series won't qualify no matter how many games are left.
Interesting Martingale betting system.
Don't take this comment negatively, but do you know how many times a 3 loss occurred? Based upon my calculations, a 3 game loss would take nearly 8 games to get you back to even.
For example, each game the team is laying -130:
Game 1: -130 Loss
Game 2: -260 (double bet to make one unit) Loss
Game 3: -390 (triple original bet to make one unit) Loss
Total loss would be -780.
I just want to make sure that my calculations are correct.
Interesting stuff. Not sure I want to get into hockey but figured I'd check it out. Maybe on something like this I'll throw something small (like lowest bet small) at it to see what it looks like or just follow the plays to see how it works out.
Thanks for posting.
Is there a system you prefer or are they already numbered by preference or you play all 3?
There is no system I prefer. I am playing them all, But system 3 is becoming contrary to plays on system 1 & 2.
I am not going to be following system 3.
Comment