Brian tends to get animated, but that's Brian. I don't think he said anything about a SCAM book. Those are your words Mark.
I think number one sums it up best.
1) we BOTH firmly believe that BEFORE anyone would consider playing with your book that it uses an established bettorsworld book. We have good business relationships with them and can many times resolve problems with them.
I'm also glad you like to name drop. You mentioned some pretty classy people in your post. I know most of them. Great guys........and there are many many more we could both name.
As a matter of fact, there are many that have never spent a dime here, and never will.
That won't stop me from speaking positively about them, either publicly or behind the scenes.
I hear from many who are on the fence about this book or that book, which many times has resulted in a customer for them based on my answer, and I'm glad for that.
You might want to consider running a professional operation and try to restrain yourself from trashing others in posting forums.
As a player, if I saw a sportsbook owner actively jumping on the bashing bandwagon, I would think twice about giving them my business.
At some point, all the nonsense has to stop.
While no one is above some criticism here and there, and no one is perfect, the trash that is posted about Bettorsworld, and particularly Brian, is unfounded and simply not true.
There's a few morons out there that like to sit back and take their pot shots. They do it because they know they can get a reaction.
It's orchestrated to a tee, and is basically a horse and pony show.
On our end, Brian should try to ignore it. Giving a response is exactly what the morons want. When they get their response, they probably immediatly whack off at the results. That's really a pathetic existence.
People should try to discuss things of importance. Things that are relevant. In this case, anything to do with sportsbetting.
In your case Mark, as a Sportsbook owner or spokesperson, you would do yourself and the industry a favor if you rose above the nonsense, rather than contributed to it and encouraged it.
I think number one sums it up best.
1) we BOTH firmly believe that BEFORE anyone would consider playing with your book that it uses an established bettorsworld book. We have good business relationships with them and can many times resolve problems with them.
I'm also glad you like to name drop. You mentioned some pretty classy people in your post. I know most of them. Great guys........and there are many many more we could both name.
As a matter of fact, there are many that have never spent a dime here, and never will.
That won't stop me from speaking positively about them, either publicly or behind the scenes.
I hear from many who are on the fence about this book or that book, which many times has resulted in a customer for them based on my answer, and I'm glad for that.
You might want to consider running a professional operation and try to restrain yourself from trashing others in posting forums.
As a player, if I saw a sportsbook owner actively jumping on the bashing bandwagon, I would think twice about giving them my business.
At some point, all the nonsense has to stop.
While no one is above some criticism here and there, and no one is perfect, the trash that is posted about Bettorsworld, and particularly Brian, is unfounded and simply not true.
There's a few morons out there that like to sit back and take their pot shots. They do it because they know they can get a reaction.
It's orchestrated to a tee, and is basically a horse and pony show.
On our end, Brian should try to ignore it. Giving a response is exactly what the morons want. When they get their response, they probably immediatly whack off at the results. That's really a pathetic existence.
People should try to discuss things of importance. Things that are relevant. In this case, anything to do with sportsbetting.
In your case Mark, as a Sportsbook owner or spokesperson, you would do yourself and the industry a favor if you rose above the nonsense, rather than contributed to it and encouraged it.
Comment